EVERYDAY PERSUASION
How we form our opinions, make our decisions, and come to believe the things we believe.

from politics to social media to David Icke, we look at how the name calling technique of propaganda is used to persuade and influence our views and opinions.

What is Name Calling in Propaganda?

Name Calling is when someone tries to discredit a person, group, or idea by attaching an insult or a negative label instead of engaging with what’s actually being said.

Instead of arguing why something is wrong, name calling simply implies that the person is bad and therefore the audience should not even consider the other person’s viewpoint.

Name Calling is also known by other names such as labelling, ad hominem, and poisoning the well.

Download Our Free Learning Tool PDF

Name Calling: How Labels Replace Arguments (and How to Spot It)

James George Frazer The Golden Bough Modern Edition eBook cover
Cover of the Will Camden eBook called Trust Me, the secret history of the third-party technique of persuasion
eBook cover for The History of the Knights Templar by Will Camden
PDF and ePub eBook cover Wilhelm Wundt Folk Psychology modern version and summary by Will Camden

The articles found in the pages of this hub can be seen as background information for the themes which run throughout our books

Profile picture of Will Camden in a studio being interviewed
Share this Post:

Table of Contents

Why not join in the conversation?

Whether it’s name calling, ad hominem or labelling, the mechanism is always the same:

Instead of using logic and reasoning to win an argument, the technique is to go straight in with a personal attack on their character in order to influence the audience and deflect from the actual issue.

The power isn’t in the insult itself, but in the implication that the person is somehow untrustworthy or flawed.

How Does Name Calling Work to Bypass Reason and Logic?

This mechanism works through three main channels:

Loaded terms condition the audience’s emotional response before any facts are considered. Introducing someone as “disgraced” or “radical,” or using a sensational headline, tells people how to receive them in advance, short-circuiting critical judgement.

Arousing Prejudice and Fear

By labelling targets as dangerous, inferior, or threatening, name calling triggers fear that overrides rational thought. Historically, terms like “parasites” or “savages” made cruelty seem justified, with the label itself standing in for evidence.

Tribal Signalling and the End of Thought

Modern labels act as ideological shorthand, collapsing complex views into simple tribal categories. Words like “woke,” “fascist,” or “Karen” signal group identity and shut down discussion. By framing disagreement as moral corruption, stupidity, or mental instability, the label offers emotional satisfaction to the in-group while explaining nothing.

 

Classic Examples of Name Calling from History

Nazi Germany

Jewish people were repeatedly labelled as “parasites,” “degenerates,” or “vermin.” These labels stripped individuals of humanity, making cruelty easier to justify.

McCarthyism (1950s USA)

Calling someone a “communist” or “Red” was often enough to destroy careers. Proof was optional. The label implied treason, and the fear did the rest.

World War I Propaganda

Enemy nations were routinely reduced to crude caricatures — “Huns,” “savages,” “brutes.” Once an enemy is portrayed as a monster, public support for action follows.

Colonial Propaganda

Indigenous populations were framed as “uncivilised” or “primitive,” which allowed domination to be sold as “progress” or “order.”

How Name Calling Is Used Today

A satirical cartoon style illustration showing the concept of name calling propaganda as used by a politician

Politicians

Words like “woke,” “snowflake,” “fascist,” “extremist,” or “traitor” are deployed to end discussion rather than open it. The label tells supporters how to feel about the target.

A pile of tabloid newspapers showing derogatory headlines to show the concept of name calling in the media

Newspapers

Tabloids rely heavily on loaded terms — “loony,” “militant,” “hard-left,” “far-right,” “eco-zealot.” A headline uses psychological priming to tell the reader how to feel about a story before they've even read it.

Talk radio & opinion TV

Guests aren’t debated — they’re framed. Once someone is introduced as “controversial,” “disgraced,” or “radical,” the audience already knows how to receive them.

Social Media

Used to collapse complex views into a single tribe.

  • Woke

  • Fascist

  • Nazi

  • Commie

  • Tankie

  • Neolib

Used to suggest hidden incentives or bad faith.

  • Paid actor

  • Bot / AI bot

  • Glow-up fed / Fed

  • Asset

  • Controlled opposition

  • Industry plant

Used to imply the person is too stupid to listen to.

  • Idiot

  • Moron

  • Clown

  • Low IQ

  • Smoothbrain

  • Mouth breather

Used to suggest the person is ethically corrupt.

  • Evil

  • Corrupt

  • Soulless

  • Grifter

  • Sell-out

Used to frame disagreement as psychological defect.

  • Unhinged

  • Delusional

  • Unstable

  • Off their meds

  • Conspiracy nut

Used to mark someone as an outsider.

  • Tourist (borrowed from subculture gatekeeping)

  • Normie

  • Boomer

  • Karen

  • Pick-me

Different platforms develop their own shorthand.

X / Twitter

  • Blue-tick brain

  • Main character syndrome

  • Ratioed (as identity, not event)

Reddit

  • Redditor moment

  • Bad faith actor

  • Touch grass

TikTok

  • Chronically online

  • Delulu

  • This ain’t it

These labels are all forms of the name calling technique of propaganda, and all do the same job:

  • Explain nothing

  • Signal tribe

  • End discussion

  • Feel like insight

Once a label has been attached to a poster, crowd behaviour tells the rest of the group how they should react.

David Icke Ad Hominem and Name Calling

Name Calling is one of the most blatant uses of propaganda used by the conspiracy movement to influence, and none more so than David Icke.

You can get a closer look at the techniques used in the novel

Confessions of a Professional Conspiracy Theorist.

Sheeple. Zombies. Asleep.

David Icke uses a range of propaganda techniques to build belief with his audience, and name calling plays a central role.

He applies labels to anyone outside his group, with especially strong language reserved for people in traditional positions of power.

Much of his website is made up of articles that focus on personal and ad hominem attacks, using derogatory framing and the technique of card stacking in place of argument or discussion.

The Unthinking Masses. The Herd.

A cartoon showing a man on stage talking to a crowd about a new moon mythology, that the moon is actually a spaceship
Michael Wright promoting his theory of the moon as a spaceship

Michael Wright is a character in the novel Confessions of a Professional Conspiracy Theorist.

Explore More

Join us for our latest articles, new books, free downloads and special offers.

Once a month, no spam.

A scene showing groups of friends having an engaging conversation

Join in the conversation.

Share your own thoughts and experiences about the themes in this post below …

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top

How your views, opinions and beliefs come from other people.

Our Gift to You

Grab your free eBook

Download this eBook as a free introduction to our series

How your views, opinions and beliefs come from other people

Our Gift to You

free eBook

Download this eBook as a free introduction to our series

Our Gift to You

Grab your free eBook

Download this eBook as a free introduction to our series

We use a few cookies to make this website work properly and to understand how people use it. No ads, no tracking across the web — just the basics.

For the Curious Mind

If this type of material catches your interest, there’s more to come.

New books, reading lists, and the occasional free download — all sent your way only when there’s something worth sharing. No spam.